| At line 1 changed 34 lines |
| �������ĵ���<a href=http://www.51jp.org>��Ʊ</a>��������--�������������ṩ���������ؼ۹��ڻ�Ʊ����ʻ�Ʊ��������Ƶ�ʵʱ��ѯԤ�������Ƴ����ù��?vip���ſͻ����ȼ����Σ������и��Ի�������������ṩ��ϸȷ�Ľ��ۺ�����Ϣ��ȫ����ʮ������֧�ַɻ�Ʊ���� ... |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/beijing/beijing_1.html>������Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/shanghai/shanghai_1.html>�Ϻ���Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/chengdu/chengdu_1.html>�ɶ���Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/guangzhou/guangzhou_1.html>���ݻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/chongqing/chongqing_1.html>�����Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/kunming/kunming_1.html>%���Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/shenyang/shenyang_1.html>�����Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/shenzhen/shenzhen_1.html>���ڻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/qingdao/qingdao_1.html>�ൺ��Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/zhengzhou/zhengzhou_1.html>֣�ݻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/tianjin/tianjin_1.html>����Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/guiyang/guiyang_1.html>�����Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/guilin/guilin_1.html>���ֻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/nanjing/nanjing_1.html>�Ͼ���Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/zhuhai/zhuhai_1.html>�Ϻ���Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/nanning/nanning_1.html>������Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/ningbo/ningbo_1.html>������Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/dalian/dalian_1.html>��l��Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/wenzhou/wenzhou_1.html>���ݻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/haikou/haikou_1.html>���ڻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/fuzhou/fuzhou_1.html>���ݻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/xiamen/xiamen_1.html>���Ż�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/jinan/jinan_1.html>���ϻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/changsha/changsha_1.html>��ɳ��Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/wuhan/wuhan_1.html>�人��Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/sanya/sanya_1.html>���ǻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/lanzhou/lanzhou_1.html><�ݻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/changchun/changchun_1.html>������Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/hangzhou/hangzhou_1.html>���ݻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/xian/xian_1.html>���Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=ttp://www.51jp.org/CityZone/shijiazhuang/shijiazhuang_1.html>ʯ��ׯ��Ʊ</a>�� |
| <a href=http://www.51jp.org/CityZone/yangzhou/yangzhou_1.html>���ݻ�Ʊ</a>�� |
| ����������ͻ����ṩ�ͻ�һվʽ��Ԥ������-����Ʊ��j������. |
| [[Talk.Creole0.6]] seemd to indicate that it wouldn't be a good idea to |
| make the escape character an addition. That's still my opinion. |
|
| I have difficulty in understanding how the decision process works, |
| especially since last week. |
|
| -- [[YvesPiguet]], 2007-Apr-9 |
|
| Isn't embedding the style directly in the generated (x)html a mark of bad, uhm, style? I mean, it should be {{{<div class="mail-quote">}}} rather than {{{<div style="some arbitrary presentation that might not fit the overall style of the site">}}}. Then again, there is the question of users using browsers that are not CSS-enabled -- they should at least see that they are missing something. |
|
| I think that the spec should show a "good" solution, or just don't show any at all if no good solution exists. I see several possibilities: |
| * only say that the text should be rendered as indented, |
| * only say thet the text should be marked as a quotation, in any way, not necessarily by indentation (some styles might use colors or colored bars), |
| * generate the quted parts as a blockquote (with a class), |
| * generate the quoted parts as a single-element, unordered list with special class for styling (with a class), |
| * generate the quoted parts as a single-element definition list with empty 'term' part, |
| * generate the quoted parts as a div, but with the '>' left in the text, and removed with style, |
|
| All of these solutions have their pros and cons, as far as I can tell none is 100% "correct". |
|
| -- [[RadomirDopieralski]], 2007-06-12 |
|
| The examples are just a possibility of how the markup could be represented. Developers have to decide for themselves which way would make most sense for their situation. |
|
| -- [[ChuckSmith]], 2007-Jun-12 |
|
| I've replaced "recommended" with "possible" for the XHTML with embedded style. Maybe this should be done everywhere. I agree that embedded style isn't very nice; however, the simplest, shortest rendition is sometimes more informational than clean output following W3 advices, which recommends against {{{<i>}}} and {{{<b>}}}. |
|
| -- [[YvesPiguet]], 2007-Jun-12 |
.