.
Good for all likely not of importance anymore in two days
You can always move interesting conversations to a page with an appropriate title later. It's a wiki ;)
Entiteling day-entries helps finding back things easier. New day-entries below this line, please.
2007-01-22#
SteffenSchramm: Hello. I updated the creole filter to support LineBreaks in blog-style. Please test if everything is ok, and whether the linebreaks work. You can use this as a test to see if you like blog-style linebreaks better.
2007-01-13#
ChristophSauer: Updated the creole filter and activated it again. After some problems I hope we finally got it to work. Some markup still is not working as expected. But I don't want to wait no longer. You should finally be able to use Creole on the creole wiki as well. We are late, could have put more effort on it earlier. Thanks Steffen for the implementation. If you have trouble with it, report it on the CreoleFilterError page or let me or SteffenSchramm know.
2007-01-09#
RadomirDopieralski: I did a little cleanup, moved parts of discussions into relevant "proposal" pages and apropriate talk pages. I hope this will help to keep things in order. I also linked from the Versions page to the proposals discussed for particular version. Should we also refactor the discussions into "rationale" descriptions on the Elements pages? They have grown to sizes impossible to catch up to for new readers.
2006-12-10 / About PukiWiki#
Please refer to the following links for the syntax of PukiWiki:2006-09-23#
RadomirDopieralski: We are making some progress, and receiving some feedback, but it seems to be pretty disorganized. In particular, it's hard to find rationales and explanations behind the decissions, as well as proper discussions on alternatives. I'm afraid that we will end up with some markup format, and not much more.That's why I'd like to start creating some GoodPractices descriptions related to creating markup language for wikis in particular, and (maybe) text markup languages in general.
If each new proposition, recommendation, good practice, etc. is on a separate page, then it's easier to document it's pros and cons, interactions with other parts, discussion.
I'm not sure if this wiki is a good place to do it, but we can try. I'm a little afraid of clashes with existing pages on this wiki, and of "hijacking recent changes" -- after all it would be nice to just look at RC here and see what's new in the draft.
What do you people think? Would you be interested in such a wiki? Maybe somehting like this already exists?
ChristophSauer: Good Idea. I think this wiki would be a good place to put it, and actually Ward also mentioned this idea of BestPractices. If we have more implementations I would like to set up a student research project that would test the usability of creole in non technical faculties. They then could use and extend those GoodPractices for creole. Let's keep it here and see how it works out. Let's keep the efforts focused on one wiki for now. I would not be too afraid of hijacking RC. If people are interested in a particular set of pages, for example how the standard is evolving, they can use the individual RSS feeds of every page to compile their own RC through their blogreader.